Section 6T - Validity of acts and decisions
Extract of legislation
6T | Validity of acts and decisions | |
An act or decision of the Information Commissioner, Public Access Deputy Commissioner or acting Information Commissioner or acting Public Access Deputy Commissioner is not invalid only because— | ||
(a) | of a defect or irregularity in or in connection with the appointment of the Information Commissioner, Public Access Deputy Commissioner or acting Information Commissioner or acting Public Access Deputy Commissioner; or | |
(b) | in the case of an acting Information Commissioner or acting Public Access Deputy Commissioner, that the occasion for so acting had not arisen or had ceased. |
Guidelines
Validity of acts and decisions
Section 6T clarifies the validity of an act or decision of the Information Commissioner or the Public Access Deputy Commissioner (and an acting Information Commissioner or acting Public Access Deputy Commissioner) if there are issues with how or when the person was appointed.
There may be other reasons why an act or decision is invalid; the purpose of section 6T is to overcome any procedural and technical argument, ensuring any issue with the appointment alone does not give rise to invalidity of any acts and decisions.
An act or decision of the Information Commissioner or Public Access Deputy Commissioner (including acting Commissioners) will not be invalid:
More information
- Or Public Access Deputy Commissioner, acting Information Commissioner, or acting Public Access Deputy Commissioner.
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 6T(a).
- Or acting Public Access Deputy Commissioner.
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 6T(b).
- Or Public Access Deputy Commissioner, acting Information Commissioner, or acting Public Access Deputy Commissioner.
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 6T(a).
- Or acting Public Access Deputy Commissioner.
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 6T(b).