Section 61R - Content of investigation report
Extract of legislation
61R | Content of investigation report | |||
(1) | The Information Commissioner must not include in a report under this Division— | |||
(a) | any information that the Information Commissioner reasonably believes would prejudice a criminal investigation, criminal proceedings or any investigation by the IBAC or the Victorian Inspectorate; or | |||
(b) | any information that— | |||
(i) | if included in a document would make that document an exempt document in accordance with section 28 or 29A; or | |||
(ii) | is subject to legal professional privilege or client legal privilege; or | |||
(c) | a finding or an opinion that a specified person is guilty of or has committed, is committing or is about to commit an offence; or | |||
(d) | a recommendation that a specified person be, or an opinion that a specified person should be, prosecuted for an offence | |||
(2) | If the Information Commissioner intends to include in a report under this Division a comment or opinion that is adverse to any person, the Information Commissioner must first give the person a reasonable opportunity to respond to the adverse material, and must fairly set out each element of the person’s response in the report. | |||
(3) | If the Information Commissioner intends to include in a report under this Division a comment or opinion that is not adverse to a person, the Information Commissioner must first provide that person with the relevant material in relation to which the Information Commissioner intends to name that person. | |||
(4) | If the Information Commissioner intends to include in a report under this Division any adverse finding about an agency, the Information Commissioner must first give the principal officer of that agency a reasonable opportunity to respond to the adverse material, and must fairly set out each element of the response in the report. | |||
(5) | The Information Commissioner must not include in a report under this Division any information that would identify any person who is not the subject of any adverse comment or opinion unless the Information Commissioner— | |||
(a) | is satisfied that— | |||
(i) | it is necessary or desirable to include the information in the public interest; and | |||
(ii) | including the information will not cause unreasonable damage to the person’s reputation, safety or wellbeing; and | |||
(b) | states in the report that the person is not the subject of any adverse comment or opinion. |
After completing an investigation, the Office of the Victorian Information Commissioner (OVIC) must make a report of its findings.2
An investigation report will generally outline the background to the investigation, how the investigation was conducted, the investigations’ findings, and recommendations from the Information Commissioner. OVIC generally publishes regulatory reports on its website.
There is certain information which cannot be included in an investigation report, including:
Information that would prejudice other legal proceedings and investigations
OVIC cannot include information in an investigation report if the information would prejudice a criminal investigation, criminal proceeding, or any investigation by the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission or the Victorian Inspectorate.14 This is unless OVIC can remove the risk of prejudice through some other means (for example, OVIC may defer publishing or tabling a report in Parliament until after the other process has concluded so that the material may be included in the report).
Information that would be exempt under section 28 or 29A
OVIC cannot include information in an investigation report that, if included in a document, would make the document exempt under section 28 (cabinet documents) or section 29A (documents affecting national security, defence, or international relations).16
Legally privileged information
OVIC cannot include information in an investigation report that is subject to legal professional privilege or client legal privilege.18
However, this requirement does not apply to information where privilege has been waived. Privilege will be waived where a person engages in conduct which is inconsistent with the maintenance of the privilege. If a person discloses privileged information to OVIC during an investigation, this may amount to a waiver of privilege unless special arrangements between OVIC and the agency were made.
Where an agency wishes to give privileged information to OVIC in confidence without waiving its privilege over the information, it should consider seeking legal advice and obtain OVIC’s express agreement to receive the information on a confidential basis and to not disclose the privileged information.
For more information on when a document will be subject to legal professional privilege or client legal privilege, see section 32 – Documents affecting legal proceedings.
Findings or opinions of guilt
This restriction only prevents the Commissioner from making their own finding or recommendation of this nature. The Commissioner may refer to a finding of another body, for example, the fact that a person has been found guilty of an offence by a court or has been recommended for prosecution by a different body.
Where OVIC intends to include an adverse comment or opinion about an agency or person in an investigation report, OVIC must give them a reasonable opportunity to respond to the adverse material.25 OVIC must then fairly set out each element of their response in the report.
OVIC will usually provide persons or agencies who are subject to adverse comment or opinion two opportunities to respond:
- first, an opportunity to review a preliminary version of the proposed adverse material and provide a response for OVIC to consider before the draft report is finalised;
- second, an opportunity to provide a response to the adverse material that is proposed to be included in the final report.
Where a response is provided by a person or an agency in response to their being provided with adverse material, the Commissioner must fairly set out their response in the report.26
Persons who are named, but not subject to adverse comment
OVIC generally cannot identify a person in an investigation report who is not subject to adverse comment or opinion. This is unless OVIC is satisfied it needs or wants to include the information in the public interest and provided the information will not unreasonably damage the person’s reputation, safety or wellbeing.30 OVIC must also state in the report that the person being named is not the subject of any adverse comment or opinion.31
Before OVIC includes an opinion or comment in an investigation report about a person (where the information is not adverse), OVIC must first provide that person with the material in which they are intended to be named.32
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61Q.
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61Q.
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(a).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(b)(i).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(b)(ii).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(c).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(d).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(a).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(b)(i).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(b)(ii).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(c).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(d).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(a).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(a).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(b)(i).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(b)(i).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(b)(i).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(b)(i).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(c).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(d).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(c).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(1)(d).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(4). See Woodman v IBAC [2022] VSC 684 which considered section 162 of the IBAC Act which imposes similar obligations on IBAC.
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), sections 61R(2) and 61R(4).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(4). See Woodman v IBAC [2022] VSC 684 which considered section 162 of the IBAC Act which imposes similar obligations on IBAC.
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), sections 61R(2) and 61R(4).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(5)(a).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(5)(b).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(3).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(5)(a).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(5)(b).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 61R(3).