Section 54 - Parties
Extract of legislation
If an authorised officer or Principal Officer makes a decision on a request on behalf of the agency, the agency is taken to have made the decision.3 This means the agency is a party to a Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) review proceeding instead of the individual agency officer who made the decision.
If a decision on a request is not provided to the applicant within the required time, the agency or Minister is deemed to have refused access to the requested documents.4 If an applicant applies to VCAT on this deemed refusal, the agency or Minister to whom the request was made is a party to the review proceeding.
OVIC’s role at VCAT
The Office of the Victorian Information Commissioner (OVIC) is not a party to a VCAT review.8 This includes where the applicant is seeking a review of OVIC’s review decision. The parties will be the applicant and the agency or Minister that made the decision.
VCAT may call on OVIC to assist in a review.9
OVIC can only be a party to a VCAT review proceeding where the applicant made a request to OVIC for access to a document, the Information Commissioner (as OVIC’s Principal Officer) refused access to it, and the applicant applied for a review of the decision.10
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 54(a).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 54(b).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 54(a).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 54(b).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 51(2).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 51(1).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 51(2).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 51(2).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 51(1).
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 51(2).