Skip to Content
From Monday 12 September 2020, OVIC's website will no longer be supported in Internet Explorer (IE).
We recommend installing Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Opera to visit the site.

Section 53A - Notification of reviews regarding documents affecting personal privacy

Guidelines

Notifying third parties of a VCAT review

1.1

Section 53A requires that third parties are notified of a review at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), and that they have a right to intervene in that review. This allows the third party to be involved in the review proceeding and provide information to VCAT about whether releasing their information would be reasonable or not.6

1.2

Where practicable, a third party must be notified of their right to intervene at VCAT where:

  • an agency or Minister refused access to a document containing the third party’s personal affairs information under section 33(1);
  • the applicant applied to the Office of the Victorian Information Commissioner (OVIC) to review the agency or Minister’s decision to refuse access;
  • OVIC refused access to the document on review, or OVIC did not accept or dismissed the review; and
  • the applicant applied to VCAT to review the decision to refuse access.7
1.3

When notifying the third party, the agency or Minister must let the third party know of their right to intervene in the review and request that the third party tell VCAT within 21 days after the day of the notice whether or not the third party intends to intervene in the review.8

1.4

VCAT must notify the third party if the third party does not intervene in the review and VCAT decides to grant access to a document containing their personal affairs information.9 If VCAT orders release of the personal affairs information, the agency or Minister cannot release the information to the applicant until 28 days after the day on which the order was made.10

‘If practicable’

1.5

A third party only needs to be notified under section 53A where it is practicable to do so. This involves applying common sense principles.12

1.6

Agencies and Ministers should exercise their judgment when deciding whether providing notice is practicable. The following factors may be relevant:

  • the age of the information or a document;
  • the number of third parties to be notified;
  • whether the agency or Minister has, or is reasonably able to ascertain, current contact details for a third party.
  1. Second reading speech, Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill 1999, Wade.
  2. Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 53A(1).
  3. Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 53A(2).
  4. Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 53A(3).
  5. Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 53A(4).
  6. Second reading speech, Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill 1999, Wade.
  7. Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 53A(1).
  8. Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 53A(2).
  9. Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 53A(3).
  10. Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), section 53A(4).
  11. Schubert and Department of Premier and Cabinet (2001) 19 VAR 35 [45]. Schubert and Department of Premier and Cabinet (which considered the meaning of ‘practicable’ in section 25), VCAT considered that the use of the word ‘practicable’ ‘connotes a legislative intention to apply common sense principles.
  12. Schubert and Department of Premier and Cabinet (2001) 19 VAR 35 [45]. Schubert and Department of Premier and Cabinet (which considered the meaning of ‘practicable’ in section 25), VCAT considered that the use of the word ‘practicable’ ‘connotes a legislative intention to apply common sense principles.

Download

FOI-Guidelines-Part-VI-Review-of-decisions.docx

FOI-Guidelines-Part-VI-Review-of-decisions.docx
Size 2.36 MB

Download
FOI-Guidelines-Part-VI-Review-of-decisions.pdf

FOI-Guidelines-Part-VI-Review-of-decisions.pdf
Size 2.36 MB

Download

Contents

Back to Index

Details

Last updated 18 January 2024

Back to top
Back to Top